Revolutionary Socialism in the 21st Century
 
Revolutionary
Socialism in the
21st Century
Jeremy Corbyn at West London rally, 17 Aug. Photo: Steve Eason.

Jeremy Corbyn at West London rally, 17 Aug. Photo: Steve Eason.

Questions to think with

Annie Teriba

Annie Teriba asks 4 questions about Jeremy Corbyn’s campaign. This is an open invitation to help think through what it means.

1. How does the changing nature of struggles jar with the narrative coming from Labour elites?

Local campaigns are doing work not just to fight austerity but also to rebuild community. Local battles and/or victories are empowering people to reconceptualise politics breaking down the perception that Government has a monopoly on the power to improve or worsen material conditions. Is it possible that this is why the claims of electoral oblivion are falling on deaf ears? Firstly is the idea that a Labour election victory is the end rather than a means to a more just society being complicated as Labour’s ineffective opposition is making the two more distinct? Secondly, because people are looking for new solutions that deal with local problems, do they see less of a need for Labour as a vehicle to articulate a reformist vision of a fairer society?

2. How can we understand Jeremy’s policy strategy?

There’s an element of this which can reconcile the charges of being an old white lefty. He seems to be taking lessons on strategy from the ‘old left’ and applying them here with quite a bit of success. His policies appear to have been written by people who have been embedded in those campaigns, and so there seems to be an element of taking local struggles as lessons for the national stage. Is this a good route into talking about the ‘social movement’? What are the possibilities of making Labour a nucleus for local struggles?

3. What do we think of Corbyn’s chances in 2020?

If we think he has a shot, should we also be talking about what he needs to do between now and then? I’m really curious about how a leader who sees himself as a vessel for a broader movement might destabilise the politics of personality. I’m also interested in how far we think this idea of a social movement might help push unionisation and mobilise beyond what has been achieved already. How can we articulate an optimism about this without glossing over its limitations?

4. Where do we fit in?

This is the most important question. There are a few parts that I want to explore. First, how do we win people round to our politics as labour shifts left? Second, if the way people are relating to struggles and thus the Labour party is shifting, is the language of reformism sufficient for these relations? Are the limitations and risks of the pull of parliamentary politics changing too – because it doesn’t definitely look like they’re getting any less significant?

SHARE

2 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GET UPDATES FROM RS21

RELATED ARTICLES

The workers have the power

Workers have the power to bring the capitalist system down

Your Party needs to bury Labourism

The new left party may be breaking with Labour, but it must also break from Labourism

A chance to defeat Starmer’s most important union backer

The UNISON General Secretary election is a key battle for the whole of the left

After-party: Your Party Glasgow initial public meeting

How the first Your Party public event in Glasgow came together. A personal reflection on the process and what next.

Is this the end of Labour in Wales?

What are the forces behind Labour’s decline in Wales and how can new movements might shape it?

Striking workers, 1926

Red Friday – why workplace organising outdoes left union officials

The build-up to the 1926 General Strike highlights the dangers of a strategy based on left-wing union leaders.

Reform and revolution

Why reform and revolution are not different routes to the same end

Zohran Mamdani speaks into a mike at a rally.

The Mamdani moment: new hopes and new hazards for the New York left

Mamdani’s campaign is boosted by struggles such as Palestine, and based on sound goals. But a strategy of reforming the Democrats can only fail.

Building from below

Draft perspectives on a framework for the foundation of the new left party